Abstract:
Reservoir characterization and play evaluation of ‘LOVE’ field was carried out to identify
additional leads and prospects within the study area. The objectives of the study is to identify
and correlate hydrocarbon bearing sands and determine their reservoir properties in order to
identify additional leads and quantify the hydrocarbon in the established reservoirs. Gamma
ray and resistivity logs were used to delineate lithology and identify hydrocarbon charged
reservoirs respectively. Petrophysical properties (porosity, volume of shale, fluid saturation,
gross pay, net pay and net/gross) of the identified reservoirs were computed using basic
equations. Some of the computed petrophysical properties were modelled to give a visual
representation of the physical property. Horizons of interest were mapped and generation of
structural maps with picking of faults was carried out. The identified hydrocarbon bearing
sands were subsequently mapped and depth structure maps were generated for each horizon.
Reserve estimate was calculated to know if the field is commercially viable based on the
volume of hydrocarbon. The structural analysis revealed that ‘LOVE’ Field is made up of
simple structural traps. The depth maps showed that the bilobate structures are zones of
hydrocarbon accumulation within the field. The porosity model revealed that porosity
distribution does not follow a special trend but it is rather related to diagenetic processes
which are responsible for the reservoir potential. The oil and gas models correlate with the
well-log analysis as the models show that reservoir R2 and R3 are charged with gas and oil
respectively. The hydrocarbon saturation ranges from 12% to 79%, 0% to 71.82% and 21%
to 88% on Reservoir R1, R2 and R3 respectively. The volume of shale ranges from 8.12% to
18.11%, 8.34% to 13.41% and 8.01% to 14.56% on Reservoir R1, R2 and R3 respectively
which depicts good reservoir of clean sand deposition. The play evaluation also shows that
several prospects are available for hydrocarbon exploitation following the interpretation done
on the structural maps that reveal many closures and many fault dependent closures in the
field. Hydrocarbon retention in the prospect area is dependent on the sealing capacity of the
fault. In conclusion, ‘LOVE’ Field is a productive field with good average porosity of about
24%, average hydrocarbon saturation 74% and average volume of shale of 10% which
indicate good reservoir of clean sand deposition. Hydrocarbon retention within the study area
would depend on the sealing capacity of the faults and the bilobate structure.