Abstract:
Ample studies have related the health promoting properties of most plant foods to their
phytochemical constituents as well as their antioxidant properties. Bitter yam (Dioscorea dumetorum)
has been reported to be rich in polyphenols and can hence lower the risk of developing several chronic
degenerative diseases. However, few studies have investigated cooked D. dumentorum in this regard
despite the fact that it is always eaten cooked. The biological properties of antioxidants depend on their
release from the food matrix during the digestion process. An in vitro digestion model was used to
evaluate the antioxidant potential and inhibitory effect of in vitro digested white and yellow bitter yam
(Dioscorea dumetorum) on cholinesterase and lipid peroxidation. The phytochemical screening revealed
that phlobatamin, steroid, anthraquinones, tannins and saponins were absent in the evaluated bitter
yam species while cardiac glycoside, flavonoids, terpenoid and alkaloid were present. The qualitative
HPLC analyses revealed the presence of quercitrin, quercetin, gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, epicatechin,
kaempferol, rutin, caffeic acid, catechin, ellagic acid in both species of bitter yam evaluated. Some of the
quantified phenolic compounds increased after cooking while others reduced after cooking. The total
phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), ferric reducing antioxidant power, DPPH˙ radical
scavenging activity, ABTS˙+ radical scavenging activity, nitric oxide (NO˙) scavenging activity of the in vitro
enzyme digested white and yellow bitter yam samples are higher compared to the methanolic extracts.
In vitro digested white bitter yam showed a higher DPPH˙ radical scavenging activity compared to in vitro
digested yellow bitter yam. Methanolic extracts of white and yellow bitter yam have higher ability to
inhibit OH˙ radical formation compared to in vitro digested samples. In vitro digested white bitter yam
has a higher inhibitory action against Fe2+ lipid oxidation in liver and brain homogenate compared to the
methanolic extracts, whereas methanolic extract of yellow bitter yam has a higher activity against lipid
oxidation compared to in vitro digested yellow bitter yam extracts. Except the results obtained for the
OH˙ inhibition assay, the in vitro digested samples exhibited appreciable higher antioxidant activities than
the methanolic extracts. In vitro digested boiled white and yellow had higher TPC than the in vitro digested raw form while in vitro digested raw white and yellow bitter yam have higher NO˙ and ABTS˙+ scavenging abilities compared to the in vitro digested boiled form. Methanolic extracts and in vitro digested yellow and white bitter yam samples showed no acetylcholinesterase inhibitory ability, while the methanolic extracts of the two evaluated bitter yam varieties displayed butrylcholinesterase inhibitory potential. Bitter yams should be boiled in such a way that the phytochemical constituents and its antioxidant potential will still be retained